enjoyment of personal propertyの例文
- The court maintained that to qualify for a trespass to chattels, " SVA must prove that Kuprewicz intentionally, and without justification or consent, physically interfered with the use and enjoyment of personal property in SVA's possession " and that had harmed SVA . Additionally, plaintiff must show that defendant have acted " with the intention of interfering with the property or with knowledge that such interference is substantially certain to result . " Since plaintiffs'allegations submitted that " Kuprewicz caused " large volumes " of unsolicited job applications and pornographic e-mails to be sent to SVA and Pearlberg by way of SVA's computer system, without their consent " and also as they claimed that those " unsolicited e-mails have " depleted hard disk space, drained processing power, and adversely affected other system resources on SVA's computer system " . . . ", the court concluded that " SVA [ had ] sufficiently stated a cause of action for trespass to chattels ."
